When the Presidents were laughing and telling Tax Payer Jokes did they all tell Braq that Fear works best.

Some Republicans want to raise the retirement age to fix social security but how will a larger worker pool with more wage competitions help?

Destruction: Pace Bowling


Song: Black Republicans(INstrumental) Artist: JayZ Clips: belongs to their respective owners and i do not intend to break any copyright laws, this video is mainly for educational purposes and to promote the game of cricket.

Creative Destruction and More Economic Nonsense


Free Online Articles Directory




Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
AB Answers

Publish Article

0 && $.browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($.browser.version);
if(ie_version Hello Guest
Login


Login via


Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out

Email

Password


Remember me?
Lost Password?

Home Page > News and Society > Economics > Creative Destruction and More Economic Nonsense

Creative Destruction and More Economic Nonsense

Edit Article |

Posted: Oct 07, 2008 |Comments: 0
| Views: 581 |

Share

]]>

My opinion of classical economics and economists turned sour shortly after I enrolled in my first economics course as a college sophomore. I was not a wet behind the ears recent high school graduate, having recently been discharged from the army after service during the Korean War. People holding positions of authority had to earn my respect, for I had seen to many people from corporals to captains whose incompetence was deadly. So when my professor began to make claims that seemed wrong to me, I vocally questioned them and often posed counterexamples. His arguments were often ineffective, and I once told him that what he had said was “stupid.” The class roared, and he threatened to evict me from his class. He didn’t and I mellowed my questioning somewhat, but never ceased even though it became obvious that questioning was not encouraged. I Aed that course, not because I accepted what was presented but because the so-called objective examinations favored by professors in the social sciences were so simple minded that a braying jackass could have passed them. About a year later, I met this professor again at a party hosted by some graduate students I had become friendly with. He said, in reference to me, that he was glad to know that there still were students around who were willing to question their professors, and I answered him by saying that he didn’t feel that way when it was happening in his class. So much for professorial integrity.

When I was a student, students and professors in Arts and Sciences did not hold the social sciences in high regard. Social science courses were thought of as crip, and they drew hoards of weak students looking for easy As. The sad fact is that those who went on to major in some social science were students who were drawn from these courses. Of course, not all those students were weak; there are always exceptions, but the social science departments abetted the attraction of these weak students by asking other academic departments to offer special, watered down courses for their majors. The mathematics department, for instance, had to offer a “statistics for social science majors” course. Required readings in these courses almost always were found in textbooks; readings from original sources were almost never required.

Someone will say, of course, that this is a mere anecdote, which is true. It has no probative value. But this anecdote is not all there is.

Adam Smith has had a vast, but not total, influence on Classical Economics. He was a professor of moral philosophy, and any serious student of philosophy who has read Smith’s philosophical works knows that he was not a first-rate thinker. In fact, philosophy curriculums almost totally ignore him. How such a mediocre thinker’s work should have become so influential is a mystery, unless those who thought him “brilliant” were themselves not very bright or because they found his theses useful in promoting their own economic beliefs for good or evil. Raising serious questions about the validity of most of his theses is easy. But there is more, lots more.

Read the daily postings on economistsview (http://economistsview.typepad.com/) and notice how much controversy exists among economists on almost every issue. Similar controversy doesn’t exist among mathematicians, chemists, physicists, and astronomers or the people in any of the true sciences. While reading these posts, count the number of times the words “believe” and “opinion” are used and how rarely the words “know” and “known” are used. These controversies indicate that not knowledge but ideology is at work. These economists are “true believers” who accept certain economic writings as holy writ, and all of this holy writ is summarized in the textbooks mentioned above. Greg Mankiw has even stated that the purpose of a textbook is to present “the consensus” of views even though a consensus is not only often wrong but can be altered by altering the list of the people asked. Given the controversy evident among economists on issues, only a fraud can claim to have found a consensus.

But the most probative evidence comes from an analysis of the theorems economists uncritically adopt. I have previously argued that comparative advantage is an entirely unworkable principle. It requires enormous amounts of data from many nations, all of which is always out of date. Even if the data shows that one country had a comparative advantage when the data was collected, there is no way of knowing that the comparative advantage still exists. After all, things change. Comparative advantage is also what mathematicians call a transitive function. If country A has a comparative advantage over country B, and country B has a comparative advantage over country C, then country A has a comparative advantage over country C. It would then be logically possible for one country to have a comparative advantage over every other country in the production of some product. But if every other country decided not to produce that product any longer and instead buy it from the country with the ultimate comparative advantage, the price of the product would increase so much that the comparative advantage would disappear. In other words, the principle reduces itself to a logical absurdity.

But given the current possible worldwide collapse of financial markets, consider Joseph Schumpeter’s principle of creative destruction. The Economist recently wrote that Schumpeter “argued that recessions are a process of creative destruction in which inefficient firms are weeded out. Only by allowing the ‘winds of creative destruction’ to blow freely could capital be released from dying firms to new industries.” Strange as it may be, I find no such argument in Schumperer.

He writes, the “kind of competition which counts [is] the competition from the new commodity, the new technology, the new source of supply, the new type of organization. . . . It is hardly necessary to point out that competition of the kind we now have in mind acts not only when in being but also when it is merely an ever-present threat. . . .” And “This process of Creative Destruction is the essential fact about capitalism.” (Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper, 1975), pp. 82-85) Notice that the words “recession” and “depression” do not appear in this passage.

Although there is something true in Schumpeter’s insight, it is also highly misleading. If you look at a list of all inventions since 1800, there are not many that no longer survive in one form or another. The telegraph disappeared when the telephone was invented, but American Telegraph and Telephone still exists. The typewriter disappeared when the personal computer was invented, but many companies that previously made typewriters still exist, having switched their production to computers and computer peripherals. Brother is a good example. The invention of the vacuum cleaner did not eliminate the broom. The fluorescent light bulb has not eliminated the incandescent, and most of the companies that originally made only incandescent bulbs now also make fluorescent ones. The electric shaver has not eliminated the safety razor. The air conditioner has not eliminated the fan. Television has not eliminated either radio or motion pictures. The microwave oven has not eliminated the convection oven. In most of these cases, although a few companies succumbed, the others merely adapted, and there is no way to prove that those that succumbed wouldn’t have succumbed if the new technology hadn’t appeared.

What is more interesting, however, is whether what was created was in all respects better than what was lost. Consider the invention of the airplane and its adaptation to trans-oceanic passenger conveyance. The airliner certainly did away with the ocean liner. But one can argue over whether the change was a great benefit to humanity. For when the ocean liner succumbed to the airliner, the ambiance of trans oceanic travel was also destroyed. So was the craftsmanship that built the elegance found in ocean liners. The airliner took travelers out of an elegant, relaxed, social environment and stuffed them like small fish into a sardine can in the sky. Is that really a benefit? So even when Schumpeter is read properly, what is destroyed may have been better than what is created. So if creative destruction really is the essence of Capitalism, Capitalism may be worse than even anti-capitalists believe.

Economic downturns, recessions and depressions, are not part of Schumpeter’s principle of creative destruction. They are merely unnatural catastrophes, and like natural catastrophes, they are merely destructive. Sometimes the destruction gets rebuilt to its former greatness; sometimes not. Sometimes it never gets rebuilt at all. And although Schumpeter did say, “For capitalism, a depression is a good cold douche,” anyone who has spent time among good professors knows that they will often utter the most outrageous things to provoke their students into a response. So just because Schumpeter did make this statement doesn’t mean that he considered it to be part of the principle of creative destruction. To make that jump is simply a bad inference. But classical economists make those all the time. So although economists claim to be engaged in a rational enterprise, they themselves are not clearly rational.
©2008 John Kozy

Retrieved from “http://www.articlesbase.com/economics-articles/creative-destruction-and-more-economic-nonsense-593693.html

(ArticlesBase SC #593693)

Liked this article? Click here to publish it on your website or blog, it’s free and easy!

John Kozy -
About the Author:

Retired professor of philosophy and logic who blogs on social, political, and economic issues at http://johnkozy.mindsay.com and http://www.jkozy.com/. Tries to avoid mere opinion and propaganda and emphasizes logic, facts, and evidence. All or any part of his articles can be cited or distributed when properly attributed.

]]>

Questions and Answers

Ask our experts your Economics related questions here…

200 Characters left

Rate this Article

1
2
3
4
5

vote(s)
1 vote(s)

Feedback
RSS
Print
Email
Re-Publish

Source:  http://www.articlesbase.com/economics-articles/creative-destruction-and-more-economic-nonsense-593693.html

Article Tags:
creative destruction, schumpeter, greg mankiw, economics

Latest Economics Articles
More from John Kozy

Print China 2011 Greater China Area Media Week Was Held Successfully

Print China 2011 Media Week was held successfully during 10 to 13 Oct, 2010 in Dongguan. About more than 100 distinguished guests joined this gathering, including representatives from sponsors, government, printing association and media, exhibitors and service providers. The organizing committee gave a full introduction about preparatory work.

By:
tesszzzl

News and Society>
Economicsl
Jan 02, 2011

The Krugerrand Value Today: Where to Find It?

Krugerrand is a coin that originated from South Africa – it was first released in 1967, dictating that someone who owns this legible to own gold. Supposedly, this particular coin is supposed to circulate just like the normal currency, furthermore, after its release, this coin was actually minted into a more durable, sturdy and valuable gold alloy.

By:
Jaclynl

News and Society>
Economicsl
Jan 02, 2011

World and Economic Predictions 2011-2012

What lies in store for the coming years? Goldsmith accurately predicted the huge rises in the price of gold and silver over the last few years. Find out what her predictions are for 2011-2012.

By:
Barbara Goldsmithl

News and Society>
Economicsl
Jan 01, 2011

China restricts foreign property investments

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has released a statement saying that China will tighten its restrictions on foreign real estate investment.

By:
rebeccal

News and Society>
Economicsl
Jan 01, 2011

New Year bash is on and so is Royaldesignonline’s Diamond Bracelet collection

Royaldesignonline brings to you this New Year a scintillating collection of diamond bracelets, that let’s you walk in style throughout the Year.

By:
elithal

News and Society>
Economicsl
Dec 31, 2010

Royaldesignonline declares the launch of its dazzling collection of diamond engagement rings

Royaldesignonline, an Atlanta based online jewelry store announces its new and captivating collection of diamond engagement rings that would certainly help you win her heart.

By:
elithal

News and Society>
Economicsl
Dec 31, 2010

Retirement May Not Be So Golden

Only 3% of the retired are able to support themselves. Others will have to supplement their retirement income by still working, at least part time, or depend on someone to help them. They thought Social Security would provide, but it is only meant as a supplement to help support the retired.

By:
Stephen Hustonl

News and Society>
Economicsl
Dec 30, 2010

Rio Grande Valley is Texas’ Retirement Destination

This article talks about retiring in the South of Texas, an area called the Rio Grande Valley.

By:
Roberto Gardell

News and Society>
Economicsl
Dec 30, 2010

Chossudovsky & Marshall: The Global Economic Crisis. The Great Depression of the XXI Century—A Review

This book describes the genesis and development of the economic collapse in ways that exhibit how serious and intractable it is. The editors have had the good sense to not indulge in any Pollyanna prescriptions of how it will all end up; they have also had the good sense not to present the crisis as a doomsday event. As such, they presents things in ways that show what went wrong and what needs to be fixed and leave the fixing to us.

By:
John Kozyl

News and Society>
Economicsl
Dec 26, 2010

Is Perfect Research Possible

Some claim that there is no hope of doing perfect research. So, is there hope of doing perfect research? Of course there is—sometimes! It all depends on the whether—whether the subject is limited and whether the researcher can write and is intelligent enough to adequately evaluate the evidence. Unfortunately, many sites on the Web are peddling research but are selling Polish sausage. Not a pretty picture.

By:
John Kozyl

Writing>
Non-Fictionl
Apr 23, 2010
lViews: 410

Advice For The Tea Party

Nearly 80 percent of Americans say they can’t trust Washington and they have little faith that the massive federal bureaucracy can solve the nation’s ills. This anti-government feeling has driven the tea party movement. A smaller government will not solve our problems. Nothing will change until we change the way government works.

By:
John Kozyl

News and Society>
Politicsl
Apr 20, 2010

What Intelligence?

If the huge intelligence gathering service works effectively, why is the torture necessary? And if torture is necessary, doesn’t it mean that the huge intelligence gathering service doesn’t work?

By:
John Kozyl

News and Society>
Politicsl
Apr 02, 2010

Not All The News That’s Fit To Print

Mainstream American journalism has been subjected to the severest criticism by the American public. One that has been missed is just plain bad reporting.

By:
John Kozyl

News and Society>
Journalisml
Mar 11, 2010

Fools’ Rules

Should law be based on rules or principles? What is the its goal? To enact rules that authorities want people to obey or to outlaw wrongdoing? The former allows the law to be used to make people conform. But conformity and freedom are incompatible. Rules-based systems turn people into sheep, allowing them to live without making moral choices. Maybe people prefer that; if so, any hope of alleviating the human condition must be abandoned, since sheep are easily led to the sheering.

By:
John Kozyl
Lawl
Mar 03, 2010

Aficionados Of Ostentation

Do those who buy the paintings of long dead artists and fund buildings for artistic performances do so because they truly love the arts or because they want to boast, “Look what I can afford to do!”? There was a time when wealth supported artists. That practice died out sometime after the sixteenth century. What goes on today borders on the absurd. While huge amounts of money are being spent, the artists themselves are being neglected. This is not love of art for art’s sake; it’s merely benefact

By:
John Kozyl

Arts & Entertainment>
Artl
Feb 06, 2010

Leftish Professors

The notion that there is political lopsidedness in academia tilted to the left is an old canard propagated by anti-intellectual ideologists who do not now and never had a taste for truth. The only reason this canard keeps popping up is that journalism is a label that leans toward stupidity. It will go away when journalists quit reporting it.

By:
John Kozyl

News and Society>
Journalisml
Jan 22, 2010

Add new Comment

Your Name: *

Your Email:

Comment Body: *

 

Verification code:*

* Required fields

Submit

Your Articles Here
It’s Free and easy

Sign Up Today

Author Navigation

My Home
Publish Article
View/Edit Articles
View/Edit Q&A
Edit your Account
Manage Authors
Statistics Page
Personal RSS Builder

My Home
Edit your Account
Update Profile
View/Edit Q&A
Publish Article
Author Box


John Kozy has 57 articles online

Contact Author

Subscribe to RSS

Print article

Send to friend

Re-Publish article

Articles Categories
All Categories

Advertising
Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Beauty
Business
Careers
Computers
Education
Finance
Food and Beverage
Health
Hobbies
Home and Family
Home Improvement
Internet
Law
Marketing
News and Society
Relationships
Self Improvement
Shopping
Spirituality
Sports and Fitness
Technology
Travel
Writing

News and Society

Causes & Organizations
Culture
Economics
Environment
Free
Journalism
Men’s Issues
Nature
Philosophy
Politics
Recycling
Weather
Women’s Issues

]]>

Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog

Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map

Webmasters
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us

Business Info
Advertising

Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2011 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved.

Retired professor of philosophy and logic who blogs on social, political, and economic issues at http://johnkozy.mindsay.com and http://www.jkozy.com/. Tries to avoid mere opinion and propaganda and emphasizes logic, facts, and evidence. All or any part of his articles can be cited or distributed when properly attributed.


www.prisonplanet.tv

China urges quick chemical weapons destruction

China urges quick chemical weapons destruction
As the 2012 deadline for the complete destruction of chemical weapons approaches, China Monday called for parties to demonstrate their political will and speed up the destruction process.

Read more on China Economic Net

Veering off the path of mutually assured destruction
As individuals, we usually recognize when we’re heading off in the wrong direction and then have the good sense to get ourselves back on the right track. Unfortunately, though, pursuing what is eminently reasonable behavior for us as individuals becomes nearly impossible as participants in a 6.8-billion-member society. So, feeling unable to effect change on a global scale as individuals, most of …

Read more on The Japan Times

Private